|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warning Signs of Alcohol Abuse |
|
Illinois Population, Income, Education, Employment, and Federal Funds
Illinois Population |
|
Total |
Year |
1980 |
11,427,409 |
1990 |
11,430,602 |
2000 |
12,419,293 |
2009 (latest estimates) |
12,910,409 |
Illinois Income
|
|
Total |
Illinois Per-capita income (2008 dollars) |
2007 |
41,720 |
2008 |
42,540 |
Percent change |
-1.8 |
|
Illinois Earnings per job (2008 dollars) |
2007 |
55,970 |
2008 |
54,540 |
Percent change |
-2.6 |
|
Illinois Poverty rate (percent) |
1979 |
11.0 |
1989 |
11.9 |
1999 |
10.7 |
2008 (latest model-based estimates) |
12.2 |
Illinois Education (Persons 25 and older)
|
|
Total |
Illinois Percent not completing high school |
1980 |
33.5 |
1990 |
23.8 |
2000 |
18.6 |
|
Illinois Percent completing high school only |
1980 |
35.1 |
1990 |
30.0 |
2000 |
27.7 |
|
Illinois Percent completing some college |
1980 |
15.2 |
1990 |
25.2 |
2000 |
27.6 |
|
Illinois Percent completing college |
1980 |
16.2 |
1990 |
21.0 |
2000 |
26.1 |
Illinois Employment
|
|
Total |
Illinois Total number of jobs |
2007 |
7,589,977 |
2008 |
7,657,328 |
|
Illinois Percent employment change |
2006-2007 |
1.6 |
2007-2008 |
-1.1 |
2008-2009 |
-4.9 |
|
Illinois Unemployment rate (percent) |
2008 |
6.4 |
2009 |
10.1 |
Illinois Federal Funds, FY 2008
|
|
Total |
Federal funding, dollars per person |
Illinois All Federal funds |
8,039 |
|
Federal funding by purpose |
Illinois Agriculture and natural resources |
105 |
Illinois Community resources |
935 |
Illinois Defense and space |
754 |
Illinois Human resources |
147 |
Illinois Income security |
4,946 |
Illinois National functions |
1,151 |
|
Federal funding by type of payments |
Illinois Grants |
1,490 |
Illinois Direct loans |
184 |
Illinois Guaranteed/insured loans |
748 |
Illinois Retirement/disability payments |
2,398 |
Illinois Other direct payments to
individuals |
1,559 |
Illinois Direct payments, not to
individuals |
140 |
Illinois Procurement contracts |
1,028 |
Illinois Salaries and wages |
493 |
Illinois Organic Agriculture
|
|
2008 |
Number of certified operations |
162 |
Illinois Crops (acres) |
29,899 |
Illinois Pasture & rangeland (acres) |
2,589 |
Illinois Total acres |
32,488 |
Illinois Farm Characteristics
Illinois 2007 Census of Agriculture |
|
|
2007 |
Illinois Approximate total land area (acres) |
35,529,619 |
Illinois Total farmland (acres) |
26,775,100 |
Percent of total land area |
75.4 |
|
Illinois Cropland (acres) |
23,707,699 |
Percent of total farmland |
88.5 |
Percent in pasture |
1.3 |
Percent irrigated |
2.0 |
|
Illinois Harvested Cropland (acres) |
22,611,443 |
|
Woodland (acres) |
1,428,922 |
Percent of total farmland |
5.3 |
Percent in pasture |
18.6 |
|
Illinois Pastureland (acres) |
887,274 |
Percent of total farmland |
3.3 |
|
Illinois Land in house lots, ponds,
roads, wasteland, etc. (acres) |
751,205 |
Percent of total farmland |
2.8 |
|
Illinois Conservation practices |
Illinois Farmland in conservation or
wetlands reserve programs (acres) |
885,837 |
|
Illinois Average farm size (acres) |
348 |
|
Illinois Farms by size (percent) |
1 to 99 acres |
50.7 |
100 to 499 acres |
28.3 |
500 to 999 acres |
10.8 |
1000 to 1,999 acres |
7.2 |
2,000 or more acres |
3.0 |
|
Illinois Farms by sales (percent) |
Less than $9,999 |
46.9 |
$10,000 to $49,999 |
14.7 |
$50,000 to $99,999 |
8.1 |
$100,000 to $499,999 |
21.0 |
More than $500,000 |
9.3 |
|
Illinois Tenure of farmers |
Illinois Full owner (farms) |
45,136 |
Percent of total |
58.7 |
|
Illinois Part owner (farms) |
23,512 |
Percent of total |
30.6 |
|
Illinois Tenant owner (farms) |
8,212 |
Percent of total |
10.7 |
|
Illinois Farm organization |
Illinois Individuals/family, sole
proprietorship (farms) |
65,748 |
Percent of total |
85.5 |
|
Illinois Family-held corporations
(farms) |
3,055 |
Percent of total |
4.0 |
|
Illinois Partnerships (farms) |
6,509 |
Percent of total |
8.5 |
|
Illinois Non-family corporations (farms) |
378 |
Percent of total |
0.5 |
|
Illinois Others - cooperative, estate or
trust, institutional, etc. (farms) |
1,170 |
Percent of total |
1.5 |
|
Illinois Characteristics of principal farm operators |
Average operator age (years) |
56.2 |
Percent with farming as their primary occupation |
48.4 |
Men |
69,196 |
Women |
7,664 |
|
Illinois Farm Financial Indicators
IL. Farm income and value added data |
|
2008 |
|
Number of farms |
75,900 |
|
|
Thousands $ |
Final crop output |
14,246,795 |
+ Final animal output |
2,105,295 |
+ Services and forestry |
1,480,365 |
= Final agricultural sector output |
17,832,454 |
|
- Intermediate consumption outlays |
8,187,291 |
+ Net government transactions |
62,309 |
= Gross value added |
9,707,472 |
|
- Capital consumption |
1,413,568 |
|
= Net value added |
8,293,904 |
|
- Factor payments |
2,960,268 |
Employee compensation (total hired labor) |
560,762 |
Net rent received by nonoperator landlords |
1,630,515 |
Real estate and nonreal estate interest |
768,991 |
|
= Net farm income |
5,333,636 |
|
Illinois Top Commodities, Exports, and Counties
IL. Top 5 agriculture commodities, 2009
|
|
Value of receipts
thousand $ |
1. Corn |
7,533,691 |
2. Soybeans |
4,233,271 |
3. Hogs |
951,831 |
4. Cattle and calves |
486,900 |
5. Greenhouse/nursery |
335,178 |
|
All commodities |
14,544,878 |
|
IL. Top 5 agriculture exports, estimates, FY 2009 |
|
Value million $ |
1. Soybeans and products |
2,267.5 |
2. Feed grains and products |
1,717.2 |
3. Other |
630.1 |
4. Live animals and meat |
525.3 |
5. Wheat and products |
190.3 |
|
Overall rank |
5,532.0 |
|
IL. Top 5 counties in agricultural sales 2007 |
|
Thousands $ |
1. Iroquois County |
418,542 |
2. McLean County |
366,547 |
3. Livingston County |
350,718 |
4. LaSalle County |
328,997 |
5. Champaign County |
311,463 |
|
State total |
13,329,107 |
|
State Offices
Illinois Drug Policy, Enforcement and Government Agencies
Governor's Office
Office of the Governor
207 State Capitol Building
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-6830
State Legislative Contact
Legislative Research Unit
222 South College Street, Third Floor, Suite A
Springfield, IL 62704
(217) 782-6851
State Drug Program Coordinator
Illinois Department of Alcoholism and Substance
Abuse
222 South College Street,Second Floor
Springfield, IL 62704
(217) 782-0685
Attorney General's Office
Office of the Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-1090
Law Enforcement Planning
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
120 South Riverside Plaza
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 793-8550
Crime Prevention Office
Illinois Crime Prevention Association
P.O. Box 426
Tinley Park, IL 60477
(312) 377-4435
Statistical Analysis Center
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
120 South Riverside Plaza,Suite 1016
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 793-8550
Uniform Crime Reports Contact
Uniform Crime Reports
Bureau of Identification
Illinois Department of State Police
726 South College Street
Springfield, IL 62704
(217) 782-8263
BJA Strategy Preparation Agency
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
120 South Riverside Plaza,Suite 1016
Chicago, IL 60606-3997
(312) 793-8550
Judicial Agency
Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts
Supreme Court Building
Springfield, IL 62701
(217) 782-7770
Corrections Agency
Department of Corrections
1301 Concordia Court
Springfield, IL 62794-9277
(217) 782-7777
RADAR Network Agency
Prevention Resource Center Library
822 South College Street
Springfield, IL 62704
(217) 525-3456
HIV-Prevention Program
Illinois Department of Public Health
AIDS Activity Section
111 North Canal Street, Suite 135
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 814-4846
Drug and Alcohol Agency
Director's Office
Illinois Department of Alcoholism and Substance
Abuse
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Room 5-600
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 917-3840
State Coordinator for Drug-Free Schools
Illinois State Board of Education
Grants and Application Section
100 North First Street
Springfield, IL 62777
(217) 782-3810
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois researcher awarded grant to help with alcohol abuse treatment
ILLINOIS - The National Institutes of Health has awarded a $712,000 grant to a University of Illinois researcher who is developing a program to help young adults with alcohol problems stay in treatment and recover with help from their friends.
Douglas C. Smith, a professor in the School of Social Work at the University of Illinois and a licensed social worker, is developing a cognitive behavioral treatment called the Peer-Enhanced Community Reinforcement Approach. It is an adaptation of CRA, a treatment shown to be effective with adolescents and older adults that strives to make a sober lifestyle more appealing than continued substance abuse by including clients’ family members in the treatment process to provide social support and positive reinforcement for sober behaviors.
Rarely do clinical researchers integrate friends in alcohol treatment, despite evidence that social support is critical to curbing alcohol abuse, Smith wrote. The peer-enhanced CRA study will be among the first to investigate the efficacy of including friends in clients’ treatment to support non-using behaviors, participate in non-alcohol-related activities with them and intervene if the client relapses or discontinues treatment.
Alcohol abuse often peaks in emerging adulthood, defined as the 18-25 year age range, yet few treatments are geared to the needs of this population.
Emerging adults account for about a fifth of all publicly funded outpatient admissions, and they tend to have poorer treatment retention and post-treatment outcomes than younger adolescents or older adults receiving the same treatment.
Accordingly, most studies on emerging adults with alcohol problems have focused on middle class college students – although the majority (53 percent) of alcohol abusers in that age group are not students.
“Treatments that are developed specifically for college students may not be applicable to those emerging adults found in publicly funded treatment centers,” who tend to be ethnic minorities, exhibit less academic and social competence, experience rockier transitions to adulthood, and have higher rates of psychiatric illnesses and familial histories of alcohol abuse than college students, Smith wrote.
“Young adults have the highest alcohol and drug use, but it tapers off as they get older,” typically after they take on adult roles as spouses and parents, Smith said. “It is really hard to tell which young adults will continue on to have chronic alcohol problems and which will not, so using a treatment approach that does not assume that all alcohol-dependent individuals will always be alcoholics may be attractive to young adults.”
Studies indicate that young adults with alcohol dependence face some difficult challenges: They are more likely to live with people and have peers that abuse alcohol or drugs, and are more likely to engage in social activities that encourage drinking. While some are able to find social support in self-help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous, many choose not to go AA’s 12-step route, perhaps because they find few peers their age to identify with at meetings or because they disagree with the groups’ philosophy of lifelong abstinence, Smith said.
Emerging adults may need specialized treatment that takes into account their unique social milieu and offers alternate forms of support. Ongoing support from same-age, non-using peers whom they already know may be more effective at retaining people in treatment and teaching them to find alternatives to drinking than programs that require them to cultivate new relationships, Smith said.
Sixty clients for the study are being selected from young adults ages 18-25 that seek publicly funded treatment for alcohol-use disorders or binge drinking through Prairie Center Health Systems’ outpatient clinic in Champaign, Ill. Those who meet the study’s criteria and agree to participate will be asked to identify a same-sex friend in their age group with whom they have contact at least weekly, who they believe is supportive of their recovery and may be willing to participate in three individual or joint counseling sessions.
The clients will be asked to commit to abstinence for the duration of treatment, which will be delivered in 12 sessions over a three-month period. The peers may be light or moderate alcohol users, which, for the purpose of the study, are defined as not having used alcohol or other drugs more than 12 days during the prior 90 days. If the peer is found to meet the diagnostic criteria for a substance abuse disorder during the assessment process, they may still be able to participate in a support role for the client, but only if they agree to complete treatment themselves.
The friends’ counseling sessions comprise an initial assessment of their and the clients’ motivations and readiness for change, an examination of the client’s alcohol use patterns, techniques for reinforcing clients’ pro-social and help-seeking behaviors, and an optional session about relapse prevention and re-engaging the client in treatment if he resumes drinking or drops out. Clients’ treatment will include identifying the rewards of sobriety, practicing refusal skills, identifying and engaging in pleasurable activities that compete with alcohol use and job skills training.
“We’re going to encourage the peer to hang out with the client a lot, but only when they’re not drinking or using drugs,” Smith said. “We want to work with the peer to understand that they can play an important role in whether their friend reduces their use by rewarding abstinence.”
As an incentive for the pairs to engage in pro-social recreation and attend all counseling sessions, they have opportunities to earn recreation vouchers, in addition to incentives for completing individual components of the study.
The clients and their friends will be interviewed at three months and six months after treatment to assess retention rates, participants’ and peers’ alcohol and drug use over time, their participation in alcohol- and drug-free social activities, clients’ perceptions of treatment appropriateness, peer behaviors that supported sobriety or discouraged drinking and whether peers were beneficial or detrimental to the treatment process.
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois researcher awarded grant to help with alcohol abuse treatment
ILLINOIS - The National Institutes of Health has awarded a $712,000 grant to a University of Illinois researcher who is developing a program to help young adults with alcohol problems stay in treatmen
More | | Illinois must keep control over Alcohol
The regulatory safeguards Illinois employs to control the production, distribution, sale and consumption of alcohol are under attack. Over the years there has been an orchestrated effort over using th
More | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alcohol Treatment Centers by City in Illinois Listed Alphabetically: | | Quick Drug Facts |
Often those closest to an alcoholic find it difficult to see and acknowledge that someone they know and care about can be an alcoholic. They may believe the promises that the alcoholic keeps making. However, with time, repeated breaking of these promises can force those living with the alcoholic to face the truth.
|
People who begin drinking before the age of 15 are four times more likely to develop alcohol dependence than those who wait until age 21. Each additional year of delayed drinking onset reduces the probability of alcohol dependence by 14 percent.
|
Today, almost one-half of the counties in Mississippi are "dry" with their own prohibition against the production, advertising, sale, distribution, or transportation of alcoholic beverages within their boundaries. It is even illegal to bring alcohol through a dry county in Mississippi while traveling across the country in the process of, for example, moving a personal wine or spirits collection to one's new residence.
|
In the United States, FAS is the third most common cause of mental retardation.
|
|
|