|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warning Signs of Alcohol Abuse |
|
California Population, Income, Education, Employment, and Federal Funds
California Population |
|
Total |
Year |
1980 |
23,667,765 |
1990 |
29,760,021 |
2000 |
33,871,648 |
2009 (latest estimates) |
36,961,664 |
California Income
|
|
Total |
California Per-capita income (2008 dollars) |
2007 |
43,402 |
2008 |
43,852 |
Percent change |
-2.7 |
|
California Earnings per job (2008 dollars) |
2007 |
59,367 |
2008 |
57,204 |
Percent change |
-3.6 |
|
California Poverty rate (percent) |
1979 |
11.4 |
1989 |
12.5 |
1999 |
14.2 |
2008 (latest model-based estimates) |
13.3 |
California Education (Persons 25 and older)
|
|
Total |
California Percent not completing high school |
1980 |
26.5 |
1990 |
23.8 |
2000 |
23.2 |
|
California Percent completing high school only |
1980 |
31.4 |
1990 |
22.3 |
2000 |
20.1 |
|
California Percent completing some college |
1980 |
22.4 |
1990 |
30.5 |
2000 |
30.0 |
|
California Percent completing college |
1980 |
19.6 |
1990 |
23.4 |
2000 |
26.6 |
California Employment
|
|
Total |
California Total number of jobs |
2007 |
20,920,250 |
2008 |
21,063,338 |
|
Percent employment change |
2006-2007 |
1.0 |
2007-2008 |
-0.4 |
2008-2009 |
-4.6 |
|
California Unemployment rate (percent) |
2008 |
7.2 |
2009 |
11.4 |
California Federal Funds, FY 2008
|
|
Total |
Federal funding, dollars per person |
California All Federal funds |
7,921 |
|
Federal funding by purpose |
California Agriculture and natural resources |
45 |
California Community resources |
695 |
California Defense and space |
1,100 |
California Human resources |
181 |
California Income security |
4,770 |
California National functions |
1,131 |
|
Federal funding by type of payments |
California Grants |
1,935 |
California Direct loans |
73 |
California Guaranteed/insured loans |
501 |
California Retirement/disability payments |
2,063 |
California Other direct payments to individuals |
1,412 |
California Direct payments, not to individuals |
45 |
California Procurement contracts |
1,423 |
California Salaries and wages |
471 |
California Organic Agriculture
|
|
2008 |
Number of certified operations |
2,887 |
California Crops (acres) |
430,724 |
California Pasture & rangeland (acres) |
289,767 |
California Total acres |
720,491 |
California Farm Characteristics
California 2007 Census of Agriculture |
|
|
2007 |
California Approximate total land area (acres) |
99,689,515 |
California Total farmland (acres) |
25,364,695 |
Percent of total land area |
25.4 |
|
California Cropland (acres) |
9,464,647 |
Percent of total farmland |
37.3 |
Percent in pasture |
8.5 |
Percent irrigated |
76.9 |
|
Harvested Cropland (acres) |
7,633,173 |
|
California Woodland (acres) |
1,270,720 |
Percent of total farmland |
5.0 |
Percent in pasture |
61.6 |
|
California Pastureland (acres) |
13,275,042 |
Percent of total farmland |
52.3 |
|
California Land in house lots, ponds, roads, wasteland, etc. (acres) |
1,354,286 |
Percent of total farmland |
5.3 |
|
Conservation practices |
California Farmland in conservation or wetlands reserve programs (acres) |
254,013 |
|
California Average farm size (acres) |
313 |
|
Farms by size (percent) |
1 to 99 acres |
75.0 |
100 to 499 acres |
15.4 |
500 to 999 acres |
4.0 |
1000 to 1,999 acres |
2.7 |
2,000 or more acres |
2.8 |
|
Farms by sales (percent) |
Less than $9,999 |
46.6 |
$10,000 to $49,999 |
22.3 |
$50,000 to $99,999 |
7.7 |
$100,000 to $499,999 |
12.9 |
More than $500,000 |
10.6 |
|
Tenure of farmers |
California Full owner (farms) |
63,777 |
Percent of total |
78.7 |
|
California Part owner (farms) |
9,843 |
Percent of total |
12.1 |
|
California Tenant owner (farms) |
7,413 |
Percent of total |
9.1 |
|
Farm organization |
California Individuals/family, sole proprietorship (farms) |
64,001 |
Percent of total |
79.0 |
|
California Family-held corporations (farms) |
4,603 |
Percent of total |
5.7 |
|
California Partnerships (farms) |
9,552 |
Percent of total |
11.8 |
|
California Non-family corporations (farms) |
1,147 |
Percent of total |
1.4 |
|
California Others - cooperative, estate or trust, institutional, etc. (farms) |
1,730 |
Percent of total |
2.1 |
|
Characteristics of principal farm operators |
Average operator age (years) |
58.4 |
Percent with farming as their primary occupation |
50.5 |
Men |
66,068 |
Women |
14,965 |
|
California Farm Financial Indicators
California Farm income and value added data |
|
2008 |
|
California Number of farms |
81,500 |
|
|
Thousands $ |
Final crop output |
25,480,413 |
+ California Final animal output |
10,416,374 |
+ California Services and forestry |
3,194,037 |
= California Final agricultural sector output |
39,090,824 |
|
- California Intermediate consumption outlays |
21,890,724 |
+ California Net government transactions |
-504,773 |
= California Gross value added |
16,695,327 |
|
- California Capital consumption |
1,456,261 |
|
= California Net value added |
15,239,066 |
|
- California Factor payments |
7,283,593 |
California Employee compensation (total hired labor) |
5,500,512 |
California Net rent received by nonoperator landlords |
327,070 |
California Real estate and nonreal estate interest |
1,456,011 |
|
= California Net farm income |
7,955,473 |
|
California Top Commodities, Exports, and Counties
California Top 5 agriculture commodities, 2009
|
|
Value of receipts
thousand $ |
1. Dairy products |
4,537,171 |
2. Greenhouse/nursery |
3,792,295 |
3. Grapes |
3,267,848 |
4. Almonds |
2,293,500 |
5. Lettuce |
1,725,799 |
|
All commodities |
34,840,647 |
|
California Top 5 agriculture exports, estimates, FY 2009 |
|
Value million $ |
1. Tree nuts |
3,240.3 |
2. Fruits and preparations |
2,802.1 |
3. Other |
2,138.7 |
4. Vegetables and preparations |
1,994.1 |
5. Rice |
523.9 |
|
Overall rank |
12,502.3 |
|
CA. Top 5 counties in agricultural sales 2007 |
|
Thousands $ |
1. Fresno County |
3,730,546 |
2. Tulare County |
3,335,014 |
3. Kern County |
3,204,147 |
4. Merced County |
2,330,408 |
5. Monterey County |
2,178,470 |
|
State total |
33,885,064 |
|
State Offices
California Drug Policy, Enforcement and Government Agencies
Governor's Office
Office of the Governor
State Capitol, First Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-2841
State Legislative Contact
Assembly Office of Research
California Legislature
1020 N Street, #408
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-1638
State Drug Program Coordinator
Governor's Policy Council
111 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-1943
Attorney General's Office
California Attorney General's Office
Department of Justice
1515 K Street, Suite 511
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 324-5500
Law Enforcement Planning
Anti-Drug Abuse Branch
Office of Criminal Justice Planning
1130 K Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 324-9112
Crime Prevention Offices
California Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
Crime Prevention Center
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Governor's Office of Criminal Justice Planning
Crime Prevention Division
1700 K Street, Fifth Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-4037
(916) 323-7722
California Crime Prevention Officers Association
100 Presidio
San Clemente, CA 92672
(714) 361-8213
Statistical Analysis Center
Office of Management Evaluation and Training
Law Enforcement Information Center
P.O. Box 903427
Sacramento, CA 94203-4270
(916) 227-3531
Uniform Crime Reports Contact
Uniform Crime Reports Program
Bureau of Criminal Statistics
Department of Justice
P.O. Box 903427
Sacramento, CA 94203
(916) 739-5166
BJA Strategy Preparation Agency
Office of Criminal Justice Planning
Anti-Drug Abuse Branch
1130 K Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 324-9140
Judicial Agency
Administrative Office of the Courts
Judicial Council
State Building
350 McAllister Street, Room 3154
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 557-3203
Corrections Agency
Department of Corrections
1515 S Street, P.O. Box 942883
Sacramento, CA 94283-0001
(916) 445-7688
RADAR Network Agency
Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
1700 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 327-8447
HIV-Prevention Program
Director of AIDS Programs
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services,
AIDS Programs
600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Sixth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90005
(213) 351-8000
Drug and Alcohol Agency
Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
1700 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-0834
State Coordinator for Drug-Free Schools
California Department of Education
Healthy Kids, Healthy California
P.O. Box 944272
Sacramento, CA 94244-2720
(916) 657-2810
|
|
|
|
|
California bill would stop alcohol purchase at self-checkout
A bill to stop the purchase of alcohol at self-checkout lanes in California was pulled from the Senate last week.
AB 1060 was seeking to ban grocery stores from permitting shoppers from purchasing alcoholic beverages in the self-checkout lanes now popular at many stores. The bill was supported by anti-DUI groups such as MADD as well as the Consumer Federation of California. Author Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, a Democrat representing South Gate, will reintroduce the bill next year.
One major issue with the proposal was the affect it would have on the supermarket Fresh & Easy. This store chain markets itself as a low-budget health food store. Part of the corporate image is low-cost alcohol sales. Another essential part is 100% self-checkout.
Opponents to the bill have expressed concern over how the bill was being used by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union to block the growth of the Fresh & Easy Chain. The Fresh & Easy chain is not part of the Union. The company currently has only 5 locations, but a 6th is already in planning according to the operating company Tesco.
Representatives from Fresh & Easy say more education is needed to show the lawmakers and the public that self-checkout lanes do not lead to easier alcohol sales. They state that both the automated systems and the store employees are effective in stopping underage purchases.
It should be noted that other grocery chains are additionally on the opposition side. They believe many consumers prefer the self-checkout, or assisted-checkout, option. Stores that promote small purchases benefit to a higher degree than large, chain grocery retailers. These stores continue to assert the automated checkout is constantly monitored by staff and cannot easily be evaded.
MADD California is not believing these claims, however. They say the systems are easy to override, as noted by several websites showing young people how to purchase alcohol through a self-checkout counter by scanning a non-alcoholic beverage twice.
Even think tanks in Washington, D.C., turned their attention to the bill. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation focuses on promoting innovation and fiscal expansion. They believe the bill may encourage stores to remove self-checkout counters and stop advancing the technology.
According to the group, the self-checkout stations reduce the costs incurred by the store. The stores, they say, then pass along these cost savings to customers. The group believes the bill is more about preserving jobs for grocery baggers than stopping the illegal purchase of alcohol.
Surprisingly, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control operated by the state to regulate the purchase of alcohol was neither an author nor a sponsor of the bill. This is the second time De La Torre has attempted to pass a bill like this. The bill died last year in committee. Pulling a bill, as was done this year, generally means removing it before the vote because it is foreseen the bill will not pass.
|
|
|
|
|
California bill would stop alcohol purchase at selfcheckout
A bill to stop the purchase of alcohol at self-checkout lanes in California was pulled from the Senate last week.
More | | Alcohol Abuse Problems Cost California 38 Billion Annually
A California alcohol industry watchdog has announced that alcohol abuse problems cost the state $38.4 billion a year in deaths, injuries, health care costs, lost productivity and other social impacts,
More | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alcohol Treatment Centers by City in California Listed Alphabetically: | | Quick Drug Facts |
An econometric analysis using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 estimated that a 28% reduction in alcohol advertising would reduce adolescent monthly alcohol participation from 25% to between 24% and 21%, and would reduce adolescent participation in binge drinking from 12% to between 11% and 8%.
|
Alcohol is a major factor in unprotected sex among youth, increasing their risk of contracting HIV or other transmitted diseases.
|
Vassar College was established and funded by a brewer.
|
In Pennsylvania the tax on wine and spirits is called the Jamestown Flood tax because it was imposed in 1936 to raise funds to help the city of Jamestown rebuild and recover from a devastating flood that year. The city of Jamestown quickly rebuilt and recovered but the tax still continues. It currently costs the taxpayers of the state over $160,000,000.00 each year.
|
|
|